Results of Buccal Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty With or Without Reconstruction of the Meatus - European Medical Journal

Results of Buccal Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty With or Without Reconstruction of the Meatus

1 Mins
Urology
Authors:
*Mikhail Borisenkov,1 Abhishek Pandey1
  • 1. Department of Urology, Sana Klinikum Hof, Germany
*Correspondence to [email protected]
Disclosure:

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Citation:
EMJ Urol. ;12[1]:28-29. https://doi.org/10.33590/emjurol/ADUS5939.
Keywords:
Buccal mucosa graft, urethral stricture, urethroplasty.

Each article is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Approximately 15–20% of patients who undergo urethroplasty (UP) with buccal mucosa graft (BMG) will suffer urethral stricture recurrence.1 The authors’ aim was to examine whether the stricture recurrence rate was influenced by reconstruction of the meatus (MR) during UP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors enrolled 1,954 patients with urethral strictures who underwent a UP using BMG from April 1994–April 2023 at their institution. Of these patients, 1,658 underwent a single-stage procedure (always ventral onlay). In cases of MR, a glans tunnelling was performed. Inclusion criteria were as follows: single-stage UP of the penile urethra (≤10 cm long; minimum distance to the sphincter: 5 cm), and no history of hypospadias. Advised follow-up was as follows: uroflow and residual urine (standing 3 months in the first 2 years, and then 6 months), and patient self-reported questionnaires on quality of life, morbidity, and satisfaction. In cases of maximum flow <20 mL/sec, residual urine >50 mL, or urinary tract infection, a urethroscopy and/or a urethrography were recommended. A stricture recurrence was defined as any instrumentation to the urethra during follow-up.

RESULTS

In 7.4% of patients (123/1,658), penile strictures were defined. The MR was performed in 46.3% of patients (57/123; Group 1). Group 2 (without MR) consisted of 44.7% of patients (55/123). The meatal involvement was unknown in 8.9% of patients (11/123). For patient characteristics see the table below (Table 1).

Table 1: Patient characteristics.
*Denotes statistical significance.
IQR: interquartile range; MR: meatus reconstruction.

From a total of 123 patients, data regarding stricture recurrence were available in 66.7% (87/123). Stricture recurrence occurred in 12.2% of these patients (10/82). There was no statistical difference between the two groups of patients.

Complications were observed in a total of 14.6% of patients (18/123), of whom 2.4% (3/123) were above Grade 3(*), according to Clavien-Dindo. In Group 1, three fistulas (one surgically treated*), three wound healing disorders, two cases of deep vein thrombosis, and one case of delirium, were observed across eight patients. In Group 2, one fistula, two wound healing disorders, three BMG-rejections on first miction voiding cystourethrogram, one penile deviation*, and one pulmonary embolism* were observed across eight patients. Two additional complications (one wound healing disorder and one BMG-rejection on first voiding cystourethrogram) occurred in patients in whom meatal involvement was unknown.

CONCLUSION

The reconstruction of meatus during urethroplasty with buccal mucosa graft does not influence the stricture recurrence rate. The patient undergoing this type of surgery should be informed that the most important complications are fistula formation, impaired wound healing, and deep vein thrombosis.

References
Mangera A et al. A systematic review of graft augmentation urethroplasty techniques for the treatment of anterior urethral strictures. Eur Urol. 2011;59(5): 797-814.

Please rate the quality of this content

As you found this content interesting...

Follow us on social media!

We are sorry that this content was not interesting for you!

Let us improve this content!

Tell us how we can improve this content?