Does Hepatitis C Independently Increase the Risk of Colorectal Adenoma? - European Medical Journal

Does Hepatitis C Independently Increase the Risk of Colorectal Adenoma?

1 Mins
Oncology
Authors:
*Maya Gogtay,1 Yuvaraj Singh,2 Anuroop Yekula,2 Asha Bullappa,3 George M. Abraham2
Disclosure:

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements:

The authors would like to thank the patients that have been affected by hepatitis C and colorectal cancer.

Citation:
EMJ Oncol. ;10[1]:32-33. DOI/10.33590/emjoncol/10198915. https://doi.org/10.33590/emjoncol/10198915.
Keywords:
Adenoma, adenomatous polyp, chronic hepatitis C, colon cancer, colon cancer screening, colonic adenoma, colonoscopy, colorectal cancer, hepatitis C, propensity score matching.

Each article is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been associated with extrahepatic malignancies such as colorectal carcinoma (CRC).1 The majority of CRCs arise from adenomatous polyps, and it is not known if HCV infection influences the growth of these pre-cancerous lesions.2 This study evaluates the prevalence of colorectal adenomas in patients with HCV compared to the general population, and whether HCV is an independent risk factor for the detection of colorectal adenomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This case-control study included patients who underwent screening colonoscopy at the authors’ hospital. Patients were divided into cases (HCV) and controls (non-HCV). Patients with hepatitis B, inflammatory bowel disease, or no biopsy reports were excluded. Colonoscopy findings were stratified on the biopsy results i.e., hyperplastic, adenomatous, CRC, or normal mucosa. Continuous variables were analysed using the Mann–Whitney U test, and categorical variables using the Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test with p<0.05 were considered statistically significant. After a 1:1 propensity score matching for chronic hepatitis C, a matched cohort of cases and controls was generated. A multivariate regression analysis to compute an odds ratio (OR) for colorectal adenoma detection rate was done.

RESULTS

415 patients were screened, of which 109 patients with HCV and 97 controls were included. Descriptive analysis showed that age (p=0.030), BMI (p=0.001), aspirin use (p=0.001), smoking (p=0.004), alcohol use (p=0.010), and adenoma detection (p=0.006) were significantly different between both groups. There were 118 polyps in the HCV group and 78 polyps in the control group, and 97% of the polyps in the HCV group were tubular adenomas. Polyps in the HCV group were arising from the ascending colon in 24.5%, 25% from the sigmoid colon, and 20% from the transverse colon. After propensity matching for HCV, 97 cases and 97 controls were generated. Following covariate adjustment, logistic regression analysis showed that patients with HCV had an OR of 2.06 (p=0.030), and aspirin users had an OR of 0.38 (p=0.010) in having colorectal adenoma (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Flowchart of the study.
*Stastistically significant p-value. CI: confidence interval; HCV: hepatitis C virus; Hep C: hepatisis C; Hep B: hepatitis B; h/o: history; IBD: irritable bowel disease; OR: odds ratio.

CONCLUSION

The authors’ study shows a significantly higher rate of adenomas in patients with chronic HCV. On multivariate analysis with and without propensity score matching, HCV infection was found to be an independent risk factor for colorectal adenoma. Current guidelines do not recommend earlier screening for CRC for such patients. Prospective studies would be required to assess if treatment of HCV leads to lower adenoma detection rates

References
Su FH et al. Patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection are at an increased risk of colorectal cancer: a nationwide population-based case-control study in Taiwan. Front Oncol. 2021;10:561420. Younossi ZM et al. The impact of hepatitis C burden: an evidence-based approach. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;39(5):518-31.

Rate this content's potential impact on patient outcomes

Average rating / 5. Vote count:

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this content.