Living and Coping with Strabismus as an Adult - European Medical Journal

Continue

Living and Coping with Strabismus as an Adult

General Healthcare
Download PDF
Authors:
Sue Jackson,1 Kate Gleeson2

1. Centre for Health & Clinical Research, University of the West of England, Bristol, England
2. Research Director, Doctorate Clinical Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, England

Disclosure:

The authors would like to thank the staff at the Bristol Eye Hospital and Great Western Hospital, Swindon, for their assistance in this project. The material in this publication is the result of the WHOQOL-UK, and the assistance of the University of Bath and the World Health Organisation is acknowledged.

Citation:
EMJ Ophth. ;1:15-22.
Keywords:
Strabismus, adults, psychosocial, coping, qualitative

Each article is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License.

Abstract

Aim/Background: Despite much research on the psychosocial impact of adult strabismus, some employing standardised measures, coping seems poorly delineated. This study aimed to: 1. document problems and their related coping strategies; 2. examine the relevance of a quality of life standardised measure (WHOQOL-BREF).

Methods: A content analysis on structured interview data from 75 individuals was undertaken using the questionnaire items in the four domains of the WHOQOL-BREF as an explicit coding structure. Coping strategies were categorised into three types: 1. adjustment, 2. avoidance, 3. deflection.

Results: Participant data coded reasonably well in all but the social relationships domain. Only women with an exotropic strabismus recorded problems in the psychological domain. Individuals with cosmesis had significantly more items in the social domain, including bullying and name-calling; while individuals with diplopia reported significantly more physical difficulties (p< .001). Individuals with cosmesis used deflection significantly more than those with diplopia (p<.038). Patterns of deflection and adjustment significantly varied within WHOQOL-BREF domains (p<.037).

Conclusions: If the aim is to understand and support adult strabismus, then these data indicate a need for strabismus-specific measures of psychosocial impact and adjustment, and more specifically a move away from the current adaptive/maladaptive taxonomy of coping strategies.

Please view the full content in the pdf above.

Rate this content's potential impact on patient outcomes

Average rating / 5. Vote count:

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this content.

Thank you!

Please share some more information on the rating you have given